report_bug
Idempotent
Report a bug, missing feature, or send feedback. Include the conversation array with recent messages for reproduction.
Input Schema
TableJSON Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| context | No | ||
| message | Yes | ||
| conversation | No | [] |
SINTEGRA: MS
Schema Changelog
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
- First observed
TDQS
A3.7/5.0
Behavior3/5
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations indicate non-read-only, non-destructive, and idempotent, but the description adds no extra behavioral context (e.g., that it creates a ticket, sends an email, or returns a confirmation). It doesn't contradict annotations, but it also doesn't disclose side effects or expected outcomes beyond the action itself.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Conciseness5/5
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences, front-loaded with the primary purpose, and a brief instructional note. No fluff, no redundancy. Highly concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Completeness3/5
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool has no output schema and the description does not explain what happens after reporting (e.g., returns a ticket ID, gives confirmation, is fire-and-forget). It also doesn't mention whether authentication is needed, though sibling 'authenticate' exists. The description covers the 'what' but not the 'outcome' fully.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Parameters3/5
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has no parameter descriptions (0% coverage). The description clarifies that 'conversation' should contain recent messages for reproduction, which adds value. However, it doesn't explain the required 'message' field or 'context' field, leaving the agent to guess their precise roles. Partial compensation for the schema gap.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Purpose5/5
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clear, specific verb+resource: 'Report a bug, missing feature, or send feedback.' The tool's purpose is unambiguous, and it stands apart from all sibling tools (auth, connect, marketplace, etc.), which are unrelated.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Usage Guidelines3/5
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides context for one parameter ('Include the conversation array... for reproduction') but lacks explicit guidance on when to use the tool, prerequisites, or alternatives. Since no sibling tool competes, the gap is minor, but it could state 'Use this when the user reports an issue.'
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Try in Browser
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
A3.8/5.0
Disambiguation4/5
Each tool serves a distinct purpose: authenticate handles login, connect reports status, marketplace is the central hub for searching and executing MCPs, report_bug sends feedback, show_version displays versions, sintegra_ms_consultar performs a specific data lookup, and toolkit_info summarizes the environment. The only potential overlap is between authenticate and connect, but they are clearly separated by actions (login vs. check status). The marketplace tool is broad but has a well-defined scope, so misselection is unlikely.
Naming Consistency3/5
Naming is mixed: some tools use verb_noun (show_version, toolkit_info), some are single verbs (authenticate, connect), and marketplace is a noun. Additionally, sintegra_ms_consultar includes a proper name and a Portuguese verb, deviating from the pattern. While all names are readable, the inconsistency is noticeable and could confuse agents expecting a uniform convention.
Tool Count4/5
Seven tools is a reasonable count for a platform that combines a marketplace, user management, and a specific data query. The count is not excessive and each tool seems necessary, though the marketplace tool bundles many sub-actions (search, describe, invoke, list, install, subscribe, etc.) into one surface, which might justify a higher count but still remains within a sensible range.
Completeness4/5
The platform covers core operations: authentication, connection status, marketplace discovery/execution, bug reporting, version info, and toolkit state. Minor gaps exist, such as a dedicated logout or token revocation function, but the marketplace tool includes billing and subscription management, so most needs are met. The SINTEGRA MS tool is a standalone query, which is complete for its purpose.