life_path
Life Path number (the core numerology number) reduced from a birth date, with reduction trail and meaning.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| day | Yes | ||
| year | Yes | ||
| month | Yes |
Life Path number (the core numerology number) reduced from a birth date, with reduction trail and meaning.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| day | Yes | ||
| year | Yes | ||
| month | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description carries full burden. It mentions 'reduction trail and meaning' hinting at return structure, but does not disclose side effects, idempotency, or other behavioral traits. For a computational tool, read-only is implied but not stated.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence covering core purpose efficiently. Front-loaded with key information. Slightly more detail could be added without breaking conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema and description lacks detail on reduction trail, meaning output, or error handling. For a tool with 3 required parameters and no documentation, more completeness is needed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 0% description coverage and the description adds no parameter-level details. No information on expected format, constraints, or examples for day, month, year.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool computes the Life Path number from a birth date, including reduction trail and meaning. It distinguishes it from siblings like compatibility and name_numbers by focusing on the core life path calculation, though it could explicitly state it's a calculation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus its siblings (compatibility, name_numbers, numerology_profile). The description does not provide context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool targets a distinct numerology aspect: compatibility between life path numbers, core life path number from birth date, name-derived numbers, and a full profile combining both. No two tools serve identical purposes despite some overlap in outputs.
All tool names are noun phrases with underscores, following a pattern of [domain]_[specific] (e.g., life_path, name_numbers). 'compatibility' is a single noun but fits the naming convention used. Consistent and predictable.
4 tools cover the essential numerology operations: getting a life path, name numbers, a full profile, and compatibility. The count is appropriate for the domain without being overwhelming or sparse.
The tools provide comprehensive coverage of standard Pythagorean numerology: life path, expression, soul urge, personality, birthday, maturity, personal year, and compatibility. The full profile tool aggregates most values, and the others provide specific subsets. No major gaps for typical numerology queries.