Skip to main content
Glama

MiniURL send_registration_code

send_registration_code

Send a 6-digit registration code to the user email, using the current guest session.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
emailYesThe user email address.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataNo
metaNo
errorNo
successYes
approvalNo
retryableNo
request_idYes
retry_afterNo
next_actionsNo
required_scopeNo
user_action_requiredNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / data / type
      Previous value: -[
      -  "object",
      -  "array",
      -  "null"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "object",
      +  "array",
      +  "string",
      +  "number",
      +  "boolean",
      +  "null"
      +]
  2. Changed7 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • changedOutput schema / additionalProperties
      Previous value: -trueNew value: +false
    • addedOutput schema / properties / data / additionalProperties
      Added value: +true
    • changedOutput schema / properties / data / type
      Previous value: -[
      -  "object",
      -  "array",
      -  "string",
      -  "number",
      -  "boolean",
      -  "null"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "object",
      +  "array",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / error / oneOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "additionalProperties": true,
      -    "properties": {
      -      "code": {
      -        "type": "string"
      -      },
      -      "message": {
      -        "type": "string"
      -      },
      -      "required_scope": {
      -        "type": "string"
      -      },
      -      "retry_after": {
      -        "minimum": 0,
      -        "type": "integer"
      -      },
      -      "retryable": {
      -        "type": "boolean"
      -      },
      -      "user_action_required": {
      -        "type": "boolean"
      -      }
      -    },
      -    "type": "object"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "additionalProperties": true,
      +    "properties": {
      +      "code": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "message": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "required_scope": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "retry_after": {
      +        "minimum": 0,
      +        "type": "integer"
      +      },
      +      "retryable": {
      +        "type": "boolean"
      +      },
      +      "user_action_required": {
      +        "type": "boolean"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "code",
      +      "message",
      +      "retryable"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  }
      +]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / request_id / minLength
      Added value: +8
    • changedOutput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "request_id"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "success",
      +  "request_id"
      +]
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "approval": {
      +      "additionalProperties": true,
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "data": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "object",
      +        "array",
      +        "string",
      +        "number",
      +        "boolean",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "oneOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "additionalProperties": true,
      +          "properties": {
      +            "code": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "message": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "required_scope": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "retry_after": {
      +              "minimum": 0,
      +              "type": "integer"
      +            },
      +            "retryable": {
      +              "type": "boolean"
      +            },
      +            "user_action_required": {
      +              "type": "boolean"
      +            }
      +          },
      +          "type": "object"
      +        }
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "meta": {
      +      "additionalProperties": true,
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "next_actions": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "request_id": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "required_scope": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "retry_after": {
      +      "minimum": 0,
      +      "type": "integer"
      +    },
      +    "retryable": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "success": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "user_action_required": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "request_id"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / email / format
      Added value: +"email"
  5. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses the key behavioral aspects: it sends a 6-digit code via email and relies on the current guest session. Since annotations provide no safety hints (all false), the description carries the burden and addresses the main side effects, though it doesn't mention potential issues like code expiration or resend behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, information-dense sentence with no fluff. Every element adds value: action, object, recipient, and context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (1 parameter, output schema exists), the description is mostly complete. It explains what happens and the required session context. It could note the relationship with verify_registration_code, but that is inferable from the sibling name.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the parameter description already says 'The user email address.' The tool description rephrases it as 'to the user email', adding no new semantic meaning beyond what the schema provides. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (send), the object (a 6-digit registration code), and the recipient (user email). It also specifies the context (current guest session), which distinguishes it from sibling tools like verify_registration_code or create_guest_token.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context by mentioning 'using the current guest session', implying a prerequisite and when this tool is appropriate. However, it does not explicitly name alternatives or when not to use it, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a clearly distinct resource and action: links, domains, tags, auth, and account status are all separate concerns. Even similar tools like shorten_url and bulk_create_links are differentiated by single vs. batch creation, and check_alias is distinct from get_link by checking availability before creation.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., add_domain, delete_link, list_tags, verify_registration_code). Mixed verb styles like tag/untag and shorten_url are still predictable and fit the established convention.

Tool Count3/5

At 23 tools, the set is on the heavy side and falls in the 16-25 borderline range. The number is somewhat justified by the broad scope (links, domains, tags, auth, analytics), but it approaches the upper limit where an agent may have difficulty selecting between many options.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers the full lifecycle of short links (create, read, update, delete, list, stats), domain management (add, delete, verify, list), tags (create, list, delete, tag/untag), and account/auth flows (guest tokens, registration, pro upgrade). It is hard to identify any critical missing operation for the stated purpose.

Resources