Skip to main content
Glama

MisarReach MCP Server

by io.github.Misar-AI

get_channels_status

Read-onlyIdempotent

Report the configuration, connection state and delivery stats for every outreach channel — WhatsApp, SMS and push.

Check this before relying on a channel: a disabled or unconfigured one silently delivers nothing. It is also the natural first step before update_channel, so you know the current state rather than toggling blind.

Reads only, takes no parameters, and changes nothing. Requires an API key. Returns each channel with whether it is enabled, whether credentials are configured, and recent delivery counts.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description states 'Reads only, takes no parameters, and changes nothing. Requires an API key.' This adds concrete behavioral details beyond the annotations (readOnlyHint, idempotentHint), and it clarifies the return values: 'whether it is enabled, whether credentials are configured, and recent delivery counts.' No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three well-structured sentences: purpose, usage guidance, then safety/return summary. Every sentence earns its place with no fluff or repetition. The main verb appears first, followed by actionable context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple no-parameter read-only tool with no output schema, the description covers all necessary context: what it does, when to use it, that it requires an API key, and the specific fields it returns. This is sufficient for an agent to select and invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the schema already provides 100% coverage (vacuously). The description reinforces this by explicitly noting 'takes no parameters,' which adds no new semantics but confirms the schema. Per rubric with 0 params, baseline is 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The opening sentence clearly states 'Report the configuration, connection state and delivery stats for every outreach channel — WhatsApp, SMS and push.' This identifies a specific verb (report), resource (outreach channels), and scope (every channel, with types enumerated). It distinguishes itself from mutation siblings like update_channel and other getters like get_pipeline.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit when-to-use guidance: 'Check this before relying on a channel: a disabled or unconfigured one silently delivers nothing. It is also the natural first step before update_channel.' This tells the agent the best practice and references an alternative tool, making the usage context clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All MisarReach MCP Server toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Every tool targets a distinct resource and action: deals, leads, lists, autopilot runs, sales agent config, channels, and discovery. Even where tools share an entity, they are clearly differentiated (e.g., list_deals vs get_pipeline, update_deal vs move_deal_stage), with descriptions explicitly calling out when to use which.

Naming Consistency5/5

All 27 tools follow a strict verb_noun snake_case pattern: create, get, list, update, move, search, score, sync, start, submit, verify, etc. No mixed conventions or vague verbs—each name precisely signals its function.

Tool Count3/5

27 tools is on the heavier side and slightly exceeds the typical well-scoped range. However, the server covers multiple subdomains (deals, lead discovery, autopilot, sales agent, channels), so the count is justified by the breadth of the domain, though it feels dense.

Completeness4/5

Core lifecycles are covered: deals (create, list, update, move), leads (search, sync, list, enrich, score, verify, send), autopilot (start, list, status), sales agent (config, actions, process), and channels (status, update). Minor gaps include no delete tool for deals/leads and no stop-autopilot, but these are likely intentional and not blocking.

Resources