Skip to main content
Glama

list_collections

List curated tool collections available on StackFiesta.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Added

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as pagination, ordering, or whether the list includes full details or just names. With no annotations, the description carries full burden but adds minimal behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that directly conveys the purpose without extraneous information, achieving high conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a parameterless tool with no output schema, the description is adequate but lacks details about the return format (e.g., list of names, objects, metadata). It meets the minimum but could be more informative.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has no parameters, so the description adds context by specifying that the collections are 'curated' and 'available on StackFiesta', which clarifies the scope.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (List) and the resource (curated tool collections), and implicitly distinguishes from sibling 'get_collection' which likely returns a single collection.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get_collection' or 'explore'. The description assumes the agent will infer from the verb, but no criteria are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: comparing, exploring, getting details, trending, listing, and resolving. No overlap.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., compare_tools, get_tool, list_collections). Even 'explore' is a single verb, fitting the pattern.

Tool Count5/5

7 tools is well-scoped for a tool discovery server, covering browsing, details, comparison, and recommendations without being overwhelming.

Completeness4/5

Covers most discovery needs (browse, trend, compare, detail) but lacks a general search tool or filtering by features, a minor gap.