Skip to main content
Glama

I Ching MCP Server by RoxyAPI

by com.roxyapi

Cast an I-Ching reading - Hexagram divination API

get_iching_cast
Read-only

Generate an authentic I-Ching reading using the traditional three-coin casting method. Each of the six lines is determined by virtually tossing three coins, producing values 6-9 where 6 (old yin) and 9 (old yang) are changing lines. Returns the primary hexagram with full interpretation, the line values showing which lines are changing, and if any lines change, the resulting hexagram that the primary transforms into. Optionally provide a seed for reproducible castings. Perfect for divination apps, oracle features, and decision-making tools.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
langNoResponse language (BCP 47). Supported: en, tr, de, es, hi, pt, fr, ru, zh-Hans, zh-Hant. Defaults to en. Coverage varies by domain, and a field with no translation in the requested language returns English.en
seedNoOptional seed for reproducible castings. Same seed = same casting every time. Pass any unique identifier (userId, session token, question hash). Omit for random casting.
compactNoSet true for the same data in a compact shape: arrays of same-shaped objects arrive columnar as {"__cols":[names],"__rows":[[values]]}. Lossless, typically 40 to 52 percent fewer tokens.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / lang / description
      Previous value: -"Response language (ISO 639-1). Supported: en, tr, de, es, hi, pt, fr, ru. Defaults to en. Languages without translations yet return English."New value: +"Response language (BCP 47). Supported: en, tr, de, es, hi, pt, fr, ru, zh-Hans, zh-Hant. Defaults to en. Coverage varies by domain, and a field with no translation in the requested language returns English."
    • changedInput schema / properties / lang / enum
      Previous value: -[
-  "en",
-  "tr",
-  "de",
-  "es",
-  "hi",
-  "pt",
-  "fr",
-  "ru"
-]New value: +[
+  "en",
+  "tr",
+  "de",
+  "es",
+  "hi",
+  "pt",
+  "fr",
+  "ru",
+  "zh-Hans",
+  "zh-Hant"
+]
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / examples
      Added value: +[
+  {}
+]
    • changedInput schema / properties / compact / description
      Previous value: -"Set true to receive the exact same data in a token-optimized shape that is cheaper for you to read: whitespace is stripped and every array of same-shaped objects is encoded columnar as {\"__cols\":[field names],\"__rows\":[[values]]}, so each field name is sent once instead of once per row. Fully lossless (no field or value is dropped or changed) and typically 40 to 52 percent fewer tokens on large results. Prefer true whenever token or inference cost matters. Default false returns standard indented JSON."New value: +"Set true for the same data in a compact shape: arrays of same-shaped objects arrive columnar as {\"__cols\":[names],\"__rows\":[[values]]}. Lossless, typically 40 to 52 percent fewer tokens."
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / compact / description
      Previous value: -"Return the same data in a token-optimized compact shape (minified, with same-shaped arrays encoded columnar) to reduce LLM token cost. Lossless: no fields are dropped. Default false."New value: +"Set true to receive the exact same data in a token-optimized shape that is cheaper for you to read: whitespace is stripped and every array of same-shaped objects is encoded columnar as {\"__cols\":[field names],\"__rows\":[[values]]}, so each field name is sent once instead of once per row. Fully lossless (no field or value is dropped or changed) and typically 40 to 52 percent fewer tokens on large results. Prefer true whenever token or inference cost matters. Default false returns standard indented JSON."
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / compact
      Added value: +{
+  "default": false,
+  "description": "Return the same data in a token-optimized compact shape (minified, with same-shaped arrays encoded columnar) to reduce LLM token cost. Lossless: no fields are dropped. Default false.",
+  "type": "boolean"
+}
  5. First observed

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false in annotations, the safety profile is already established. The description adds valuable behavioral detail beyond annotations: the three-coin methodology, line values 6-9, changing lines, and the return of both primary and transformed hexagrams. It is transparent about how the reading is produced and what is returned.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured and front-loaded with the core purpose, followed by mechanics, return contents, and use cases. Every sentence contributes useful information without redundancy or marketing fluff. It is appropriately sized for the tool's complexity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, so the description compensates by clearly stating what the tool returns: primary hexagram, line values, and optional transformed hexagram. Parameter details are fully covered by the input schema, and annotations cover the read-only behavior. An agent has enough information to select and invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents lang, seed, and compact thoroughly. The description adds only a brief mention of seed reproducibility, but this largely duplicates the schema field description. Baseline 3 is appropriate because the description does not materially enrich parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool generates an I-Ching reading via the three-coin casting method, which is distinct from sibling tools focused on hexagram lookup or random hexagram selection. It also specifies the output: primary hexagram, changing lines, and transformed hexagram. This is a specific verb-plus-resource definition with no ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description identifies clear contexts like divination apps, oracle features, and decision-making tools, and explains the casting method that distinguishes it from lookup-oriented siblings. It does not explicitly name alternatives or state when not to use the tool, so it falls short of full explicit routing guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All I Ching MCP Server by RoxyAPI toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

Several tools have overlapping functionality: get_iching_hexagrams_random, post_iching_daily, get_iching_cast, and post_iching_daily_cast all return hexagram readings with interpretation, and their boundaries are subtle. The lookup variants are distinguishable, but agents could easily pick the wrong reading or casting tool.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most tools follow a clear get_iching_<resource> pattern with readable modifiers. However, the post_ prefix in two tools breaks the otherwise uniform get_ style even though all tools are fundamentally retrieval or generation endpoints.

Tool Count4/5

Nine tools is within a reasonable range for an I Ching reference and divination server, and most add a distinct access mode. The daily/random and cast/daily_cast pairs introduce slight redundancy, making the set slightly fuller than necessary.

Completeness5/5

The surface covers the core oracle workflow: casting, daily readings, lookups by number or binary pattern, listing all hexagrams, and trigram reference. There are no obvious dead ends since returned hexagrams can be re-looked-up by number.

Resources