Skip to main content
Glama

Crystals MCP Server by RoxyAPI

by com.roxyapi

Crystals by chakra - Chakra healing stones API

get_crystals_chakra
Read-only

Get healing crystals and gemstones that resonate with a specific chakra energy center. Returns summary data for each crystal. Use the /crystals/{id} detail endpoint for full healing properties. Supports all 7 primary chakras: Root, Sacral, Solar Plexus, Heart, Throat, Third Eye, and Crown. Essential for crystal grid building, chakra balancing, and energy healing applications.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
langNoResponse language (BCP 47). Supported: en, tr, de, es, hi, pt, fr, ru, zh-Hans, zh-Hant. Defaults to en. Coverage varies by domain, and a field with no translation in the requested language returns English.en
limitNoMaximum items to return per page. Range: 1-30, default 20.
chakraYesChakra name, case-insensitive (e.g., heart, Heart, HEART all work). Valid: Root, Sacral, Solar Plexus, Heart, Throat, Third Eye, Crown.
offsetNoNumber of items to skip for pagination. Default 0.
compactNoSet true for the same data in a compact shape: arrays of same-shaped objects arrive columnar as {"__cols":[names],"__rows":[[values]]}. Lossless, typically 40 to 52 percent fewer tokens.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / lang / description
      Previous value: -"Response language (ISO 639-1). Supported: en, tr, de, es, hi, pt, fr, ru. Defaults to en. Languages without translations yet return English."New value: +"Response language (BCP 47). Supported: en, tr, de, es, hi, pt, fr, ru, zh-Hans, zh-Hant. Defaults to en. Coverage varies by domain, and a field with no translation in the requested language returns English."
    • changedInput schema / properties / lang / enum
      Previous value: -[
-  "en",
-  "tr",
-  "de",
-  "es",
-  "hi",
-  "pt",
-  "fr",
-  "ru"
-]New value: +[
+  "en",
+  "tr",
+  "de",
+  "es",
+  "hi",
+  "pt",
+  "fr",
+  "ru",
+  "zh-Hans",
+  "zh-Hant"
+]
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / examples
      Added value: +[
+  {
+    "chakra": "Heart"
+  }
+]
    • changedInput schema / properties / compact / description
      Previous value: -"Set true to receive the exact same data in a token-optimized shape that is cheaper for you to read: whitespace is stripped and every array of same-shaped objects is encoded columnar as {\"__cols\":[field names],\"__rows\":[[values]]}, so each field name is sent once instead of once per row. Fully lossless (no field or value is dropped or changed) and typically 40 to 52 percent fewer tokens on large results. Prefer true whenever token or inference cost matters. Default false returns standard indented JSON."New value: +"Set true for the same data in a compact shape: arrays of same-shaped objects arrive columnar as {\"__cols\":[names],\"__rows\":[[values]]}. Lossless, typically 40 to 52 percent fewer tokens."
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / offset / type
      Previous value: -"integer"New value: +[
+  "integer",
+  "null"
+]
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / compact / description
      Previous value: -"Return the same data in a token-optimized compact shape (minified, with same-shaped arrays encoded columnar) to reduce LLM token cost. Lossless: no fields are dropped. Default false."New value: +"Set true to receive the exact same data in a token-optimized shape that is cheaper for you to read: whitespace is stripped and every array of same-shaped objects is encoded columnar as {\"__cols\":[field names],\"__rows\":[[values]]}, so each field name is sent once instead of once per row. Fully lossless (no field or value is dropped or changed) and typically 40 to 52 percent fewer tokens on large results. Prefer true whenever token or inference cost matters. Default false returns standard indented JSON."
  5. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / compact
      Added value: +{
+  "default": false,
+  "description": "Return the same data in a token-optimized compact shape (minified, with same-shaped arrays encoded columnar) to reduce LLM token cost. Lossless: no fields are dropped. Default false.",
+  "type": "boolean"
+}
  6. Added

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds useful context about summary return data and chakra coverage, but it does not disclose pagination behavior or response shape beyond that. This is adequate given the annotation coverage, but not exceptional.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core purpose and stays reasonably compact. The list of chakras and the closing use-case sentence add some redundancy with the schema and title, but each sentence still contributes useful orientation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only list endpoint with fully documented parameters and readOnly annotations, the description covers the essential context: what the tool returns, which chakras are supported, and where to go for full details. With no output schema, a bit more detail about the summary response shape could help, but nothing critical blocks correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema fully documents all 5 parameters. The description reinforces that the chakra parameter is central and lists valid values, but it adds no meaning beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Get healing crystals and gemstones that resonate with a specific chakra energy center.' It clearly distinguishes itself from the detail endpoint by noting that it returns summary data, and it enumerates all 7 supported chakras, leaving no ambiguity about scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly routes to the alternative detail endpoint: 'Use the /crystals/{id} detail endpoint for full healing properties.' It also gives concrete application contexts ('crystal grid building, chakra balancing, and energy healing applications'), so an agent knows when this tool is the right choice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Crystals MCP Server by RoxyAPI toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation3/5

The main get_crystals endpoint already supports filtering by chakra, element, and zodiac, making the dedicated filter endpoints partially redundant. However, each tool has a clearly named purpose, so an agent can usually pick the right one.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most tools follow a consistent get_crystals_<suffix> pattern, but post_crystals_daily breaks the verb convention, and suffix ordering is slightly inconsistent (e.g., pairings_id vs id).

Tool Count5/5

12 tools is well within the ideal range for a domain-specific read-only API. Each tool serves a distinct browsing, search, detail, filter, reference, or discovery function.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers listing, detail, search, filters, random, daily, pairings, and reference values. Minor gap: no direct tool for enumerating chakras/elements/zodiac signs, though those are small fixed sets handled by the main list.

Resources