Skip to main content
Glama

Asterwise

by com.asterwise.mcp

Pitra Dosha

asterwise_get_pitra_dosha
Read-only

Detects and analyses Pitru Dosha (Pitru Shapa — Ancestral Curse) using all five classical Pitru Dosha combinations.

WORKFLOW: BEFORE: None — birth data computes everything needed. AFTER: asterwise_get_puja_suggestions — recommend remedial pujas for Sun/Mars.

INPUT CONTRACT: birth — BirthData (date, time, lat, lon, timezone).

DO NOT CONFUSE WITH: asterwise_get_doshas — returns pitru_dosha as one of twelve doshas with less detail. Use this tool when dedicated Pitru Dosha analysis is needed.

Full output and error contract: https://docs.asterwise.com/mcp/tools/get-pitra-dosha/

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
birthYesBirth data for a single person.
response_formatNoOutput format: 'markdown' (default) for a readable report, or 'json' for the raw structured payload.markdown

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / response_format / description
      Added value: +"Output format: 'markdown' (default) for a readable report, or 'json' for the raw structured payload."
  2. Changed8 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / date / description
      Previous value: -"Birth date in YYYY-MM-DD format. Example: '1985-11-12'"New value: +"Birth date YYYY-MM-DD."
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / lat / description
      Previous value: -"Birth latitude in decimal degrees. North positive, south negative. Example: 19.0760 for Mumbai, -33.8688 for Sydney"New value: +"Latitude in decimal degrees, north positive (Mumbai 19.076)."
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / lon / description
      Previous value: -"Birth longitude in decimal degrees. East positive, west negative. Example: 72.8777 for Mumbai, -74.0060 for New York"New value: +"Longitude in decimal degrees, east positive (Mumbai 72.8777)."
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / person_name / description
      Previous value: -"Name of the person for this chart. Example: 'Arjun Mehta'"New value: +"Person's name, used in labels only."
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / time / description
      Previous value: -"Birth time in HH:MM 24-hour format. Example: '06:45'. Omit entirely if the birth time is unknown: a sunrise chart is used and birth_time_provided returns false. Do not pass '00:00' for an unknown time, it is treated as a real midnight birth and returns a confidently wrong ascendant."New value: +"Birth time HH:MM (24h), e.g. '06:45'. Omit if unknown (a sunrise chart is used and birth_time_provided=false); never pass '00:00' for unknown."
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / timezone / description
      Previous value: -"IANA timezone for the birth location. Examples: 'Asia/Kolkata' (India), 'America/New_York' (New York), 'Europe/London' (London), 'Asia/Tokyo' (Japan), 'America/Los_Angeles' (Los Angeles), 'Europe/Paris' (Paris), 'Asia/Dubai' (Dubai), 'Asia/Singapore' (Singapore), 'America/Chicago' (Chicago), 'Australia/Sydney' (Sydney). Default: Asia/Kolkata"New value: +"IANA timezone of the birth place, e.g. 'Asia/Kolkata', 'America/New_York', 'Europe/London'. Default: Asia/Kolkata"
    • addedInput schema / properties / response_format / default
      Added value: +"markdown"
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
-  "birth",
-  "response_format"
-]New value: +[
+  "birth"
+]
  3. Changed6 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / time / anyOf
      Added value: +[
+  {
+    "pattern": "^\\d{2}:\\d{2}$",
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  {
+    "type": "null"
+  }
+]
    • addedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / time / default
      Added value: +null
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / time / description
      Previous value: -"Birth time in HH:MM format (24-hour). Example: '06:45'. Use '00:00' if unknown."New value: +"Birth time in HH:MM 24-hour format. Example: '06:45'. Omit entirely if the birth time is unknown: a sunrise chart is used and birth_time_provided returns false. Do not pass '00:00' for an unknown time, it is treated as a real midnight birth and returns a confidently wrong ascendant."
    • removedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / time / pattern
      Removed value: -"^\\d{2}:\\d{2}$"
    • removedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / time / type
      Removed value: -"string"
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / required
      Previous value: -[
-  "date",
-  "time",
-  "lat",
-  "lon"
-]New value: +[
+  "date",
+  "lat",
+  "lon"
+]
  4. Added

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds valuable behavioral context beyond annotations: the fact that birth data computes everything needed, the recommendation workflow into puja suggestions, and a link to the full output/error contract. It doesn't enumerate edge cases, but this exceeds baseline given the annotated safety guarantees.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is tightly structured into labeled sections (WORKFLOW, INPUT CONTRACT, DO NOT CONFUSE WITH, docs link) with zero filler. Each sentence contributes distinct value: purpose, sequencing, sibling differentiation, and a pointer to the full contract. It is compact despite conveying a lot of information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return values don't need to be spelled out in the description. The description covers the essential agent-facing context: what the tool computes, that there are no prerequisites, the recommended follow-up tool, how it differs from a sibling, and where to find full output/error details. Nothing an agent needs to call it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the input schema already documents every parameter meaning, format, defaults, and constraints. The description's INPUT CONTRACT merely restates the birth fields already present in the schema without adding new semantic detail. Baseline 3 is appropriate when the schema carries the full parameter documentation burden.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific action ('Detects and analyses Pitru Dosha (Pitru Shapa — Ancestral Curse)') against a clear resource, and names the exact classical combinations used. The DO NOT CONFUSE WITH section explicitly differentiates it from asterwise_get_doshas, so an agent can identify its unique role without ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives explicit when-to-use guidance: 'Use this tool when dedicated Pitru Dosha analysis is needed,' and names the alternative (asterwise_get_doshas) with the reason to choose it instead. It also provides workflow context with BEFORE (none) and AFTER (asterwise_get_puja_suggestions) steps, leaving no inference required.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Asterwise toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation3/5

Many tools are well-differentiated by explicit 'DO NOT CONFUSE WITH' notes, but the sheer number of near-neighbor pairs (e.g., crystal vs gemstone recommendations, natal chart variants, dasha systems, compatibility systems, tarot draw variants) creates real selection risk. The descriptions mitigate overlap, but an agent browsing 103 tools will struggle to pick the right one.

Naming Consistency5/5

Every tool follows the asterwise_get_* or asterwise_draw_* prefix convention with a clear noun phrase (e.g., asterwise_get_natal_chart, asterwise_draw_tarot_cards). The two verbs 'get' and 'draw' are semantically appropriate, and there are no camelCase or mixed-style names.

Tool Count1/5

103 tools is far beyond a manageable MCP surface. While the domain is broad (Vedic astrology, Western astrology, numerology, tarot, crystals, dream symbols), the server bundles multiple distinct domains into one namespace, making it nearly impossible for an agent to discover the right tool efficiently.

Completeness4/5

The surface is impressively comprehensive across astrology, numerology, tarot, and remedies, with deep coverage of dasha systems, compatibility frameworks, and chart types. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tarot interpretation endpoint, no batch operations, no update/delete since it's read-only data), but for a reference/prediction API the coverage is strong.

Resources