Skip to main content
Glama

DC Hub — Data Center Site Selection & Colocation: Electricity, Power Grid, Gas, Fiber

by cloud.dchub

Live Grid Data

get_grid_data
Read-onlyIdempotent

Real-time electricity grid data for the 7 US ISOs (PJM, ERCOT, CAISO, MISO, SPP, NYISO, ISO-NE) via EIA hourly RTO: fuel mix, demand, 24h demand curve. Pass iso=PJM (any of the 7). Raw real-time telemetry for one ISO; do NOT use for power-availability, time-to-power or interconnection-queue analysis (use get_grid_intelligence), nor for retail/gas pricing detail (use get_energy_prices). For non-US grids (GB, EU bidding zones, Taiwan, Australia) use get_grid_scoreboard.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
isoNoISO/RTO grid region (required): ERCOT, PJM, MISO, CAISO, SPP, NYISO, ISONE
metricNoOptional metric focus, e.g. fuel_mix, demand, demand_curve
periodNoOptional time window for the metric, e.g. 24h

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
quotaNoCaller quota state (remaining calls, tier) when available.
_entityNoPayload class discriminator (e.g. facility|market|iso_grid|queue_results|deal|report|response) — branch on this before parsing the rest.
citationNoMachine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload. Normally an OBJECT {source, url, license, cite_as, retrieved_at}; a bare string is accepted and carries the attribution line itself.
provenanceNoCollection-level provenance block: {source, method, as_of, verification_counts, cite_url_template, license, cite_as}. Quote the verification level when citing.
_front_doorNoIn-band front-door hint (first workflow-entry tool of a session): call plan_query(intent) first for the ordered multi-step plan.
_return_loopNoSuggested next-session delta call (get_changes since=24h) so you pull only what changed.
site_evaluation_handoffNoPre-built follow-up calls (analyze_site / get_water_risk args) when the payload carries coordinates — an array of {tool, parameters, why} entries.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, covering the safety profile. The description adds meaningful behavioral context: data is raw real-time telemetry for exactly one ISO, sourced from EIA hourly RTO, and limited to the 7 US ISOs. This gives the agent a clearer sense of the data's nature and limitations without contradicting annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences with no filler. It front-loads the core purpose, then compactly provides scope limitations, alternatives, and geographic boundaries. Every sentence carries decision-relevant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the annotations, output schema, and a relatively simple 3-parameter interface, the description covers all key aspects needed for selection and invocation: what data is returned, for which regions, how to specify the ISO, and which sibling tools to use instead. Nothing critical appears missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already provides 100% description coverage for all three parameters. The description adds concrete usage hints such as 'Pass iso=PJM (any of the 7)' and enumerates example values for metric (fuel_mix, demand, demand_curve), which helps correct invocation beyond the schema alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states a specific verb ('get real-time electricity grid data'), a specific resource (7 US ISOs via EIA hourly RTO), and the key data dimensions (fuel mix, demand, 24h demand curve). It also explicitly distinguishes itself from sibling tools such as get_grid_intelligence, get_energy_prices, and get_grid_scoreboard by delineating what it is not for, so an agent can reliably identify this tool from its siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit when-to-use and when-not-to-use guidance with named alternatives: do not use for power-availability/time-to-power/interconnection-queue analysis (use get_grid_intelligence), do not use for retail/gas pricing (use get_energy_prices), and for non-US grids use get_grid_scoreboard. This is model guidance for tool selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All DC Hub — Data Center Site Selection & Colocation: Electricity, Power Grid, Gas, Fiber toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

Multiple tools occupy nearly identical semantic space: search/search_facilities/search_intelligence/semantic_search all retrieve data, and analyze_site/compare_sites/score_facility/get_composite_site_score/rank_sites all score or rank locations. Despite extensive disambiguation in the descriptions, the boundaries are subtle enough that an agent will likely misroute queries. Account and meta tools (claim_free_key, bind_email, unlock_more_data, subscribe_digest, recover_my_key, execute_plan, plan_query, discover_tools) add further selection noise.

Naming Consistency4/5

The vast majority of tools follow a clear snake_case verb_noun convention (get_*, search_*, list_*, set_*, save_*, compare_*, analyze_*, rank_*, plan_*). A few noun-phrase names break the pattern (deal_autopsy, hyperscaler_deals, grid_transition_radar, site_selection_canvas, standing_intent, ai_capacity_index), but these are still readable and discoverable.

Tool Count1/5

83 tools is an extreme count for any server, far beyond the 25+ threshold that already signals bloat. The domain is broad, but the catalog is inflated by overlapping variants, multiple meta-tools (execute_plan, plan_query, discover_tools, get_agent_registry, get_backup_status, summarize_for_citation), and account/upgrade plumbing (claim_free_key, bind_email, recover_my_key, unlock_more_data, subscribe_digest). This imposes heavy context and selection costs on agents.

Completeness5/5

The data-center siting domain is covered exhaustively: single-site scoring, market ranking, grid/gas/fiber/water/climate/disaster/tax/permitting intelligence, interconnection queues, construction pipeline, deals/news, saved-site monitoring, alerts, research dossiers, and citation support. Every workflow has a continuation path, so agents will not hit dead ends.

Resources