Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents document_id, content, and mode thoroughly, including default and validation behavior. The tool description mostly paraphrases the mode semantics and adds no new parameter-level meaning beyond emphasizing that the result reports the applied mode.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.